Re: [OT] Re: gdb vs. glibc (glibc-devel-2.0.7-19, aka RedHat 5.1

Andreas Jaeger (aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de)
07 Oct 1998 18:22:34 +0200


>>>>> Philip Blundell writes:

>> So you pretend to change the kernel or glibc to match the includes of an
>> application?

P> The application is only doing what it's supposed to do. The problem is that
P> glibc refers to a file that doesn't exist any more. I guess <sys/debugreg.h>
P> needs decoupling from the kernel headers too.

This has been done already for glibc 2.1 and I've asked Ulrich Drepper
to include that patch for glibc 2.0.7-final also.

Let's close this discussion which is offtopic to linux-kernel - or
continue it on glibc lists (see Reply-To!).

Andreas

-- 
 Andreas Jaeger   aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de    jaeger@informatik.uni-kl.de
  for pgp-key finger ajaeger@aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/