Re: [PATCH] NIPQUAD macro broken on big endian

Jes Sorensen (Jes.Sorensen@cern.ch)
10 Oct 1998 14:56:08 +0200


>>>>> "David" == David S Miller <davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com> writes:

David> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 1998 11:36:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus
David> Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>

> Because of the f*cking vger braindamage.
>
> People have sent me patches from vger, and when I tell them
> that they are broken, nobody fixes vger.
>
> Doesn't anybody see what's wrong here?

David> Correction, I yanked that patch from vger precisely the moment
David> you told me you hated it. Andreas is just sending it again on
David> his own, independantly of vger, this patch does not exist in
David> vger and hasn't since you barfed at the sight of it.

I believe the reason for all this is that _I_ kept the patch in the
m68k tree because it does solve a bug for us. I thought Andreas was
copied when mail was bounced around about this when you took it out
from the vger tree, seems that I was wrong.

I should have made a comment in the code saying something like 'don't
send this to Linus before someone comes up with a better patch'.

Jes

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/