Re: [ME TOO] Re: Linux-2.1.125 ... pre-2.2 imminent - SCSI issues

Tim Smith (tzs@tzs.net)
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 02:20:27 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: 2.1.111: IDE DMA disabled?"
Previous message: Mikael Hedin: "Re: Bootparam -- nfsaddrs not working?"
In reply to: teamwork@freemail.c3.hu: "Re: Automating 2.3 patches"

On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Shannon Hendrix wrote:
> The 53x700 eats CPU, the Adaptec seems better in this case, even
> the 1540B which has no CPU.

I don't understand why a 53x700 would eat CPU. Are you sure you don't
mean a 53x400?

--Tim Smith

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Marcin Dalecki: "Re: 2.1.111: IDE DMA disabled?"
Previous message: Mikael Hedin: "Re: Bootparam -- nfsaddrs not working?"
In reply to: teamwork@freemail.c3.hu: "Re: Automating 2.3 patches"