Re: libc.so.5.4.46 binaries

Glynn Clements (glynn@sensei.co.uk)
Tue, 13 Oct 1998 02:16:01 +0100 (BST)


Barry Treahy wrote:

> I have to admit I missed the reference to ld.so.1.9.9, but I probably missed it
> because I've built gcc and glib2 without problems... Because I'm missing the
> symbolic link to the ld.so.x.x.x, how can I confirm which version I have?

The dynamic linker is actually called `ld-linux.so'. This should be a
symlink to ld-linux.so.1, which should be a symlink to ld-linux.so.1.x.x.

-- 
Glynn Clements <glynn@sensei.co.uk>

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/