POSIX doesn't have to say. 1003.1g is still unfinished and has fundamental
design flaws that even though I have pointed them out to the listed contacts
have not been resolved as far as I know. In paticular the bind() function
is assumed to be atomic. Name binding is not atomic for all protocols.
The man pages are a valid point. Andi Kleen is working on an update for
these including notes on all the new 2.1.x features, I'm sure he would
appreciate help.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/