May by it's kinda miracle, but I do succesfully run gated-3.5.10 with ospf
here ...
Kernel is 2.1.125-ac2 with patched eepro100-1.0.3. Those complains are
rather normal, you can safely ignore them. gateds 3.5.[89] did also produce
a lot of similar crap with 2.1.1xx but did work. The same for 3.5.10.
> Looks like Gated is hosed under 2.1.125. It works just fine under 2.1.118..
> same binary... I've recompiled and gotten a bit farther than I did before..
> anyway, here's the output:
>
> Oct 14 03:31:27 krt_rtread: Initial routes read from kernel (via
> /proc/net/route
> ):
> Oct 14 03:31:27 rt_add: host bits not zero 208.0.84.154/0.0.0.0 gw
> 208.0.84.142
> Kernel
> KRT READ REMNANT 208.0.84.154 mask 0.0.0.0 router 208.0.84.142
> fla
> gs <>0: queueing delete for rt_add() failure
> Oct 14 03:31:27 rt_add: host bits not zero 208.0.84.187/0.0.0.0 gw
> 208.0.84.142
> Kernel
> KRT READ REMNANT 208.0.84.187 mask 0.0.0.0 router 208.0.84.142
> fla
> gs <>0: queueing delete for rt_add() failure
> Oct 14 03:31:27 rt_add: host bits not zero 208.0.84.200/0.0.0.0 gw
> 208.0.84.142
> Kernel
> ... [more lines like this]
> KRT SEND DELETE 208.0.84.180 mask 0.0.0.0 router 208.0.84.142
> flag
> s <GW>2: Invalid argument
> KRT SEND DELETE 208.0.84.215 mask 0.0.0.0 router 208.0.84.142
> flag
> s <GW>2: Invalid argument
> KRT SEND DELETE 206.105.188 mask 0.0.0.0 router 206.105.188.4
> flag
> s <GW>2: Invalid argument
> KRT SEND DELETE 206.105.188 mask 0.0.0.0 router 206.105.188.4
> flag
> s <GW>2: Invalid argument
>
> What's odd is it's refering to the gateway address as the virtual interface,
> and the mask is completely off. What changed? I checked /proc/net/route...
> and the sscanf function shouldn't have any problems. Another odd thing is, I
> appear to have two routing entries which are exactly the same in
> /proc/net/route:
>
> eth0 00BC69CE 00000000 0001 0 0 0
> 00FFFFFF
> 0 0 0
> eth0 00BC69CE 00000000 0001 0 0 0
> 00FFFFFF
> 0 0 0
>
> I'm pretty sure this sort of behavior shouldn't be allowed :)
>
> Anyway, it's sort of important than I get OSPF up and running again, so I'd
> appreciate it if someone could tell me what possibly could have changed to
> affected gated this badly. If someone has a patch to make my life easier,
> I'd appreciate it.
>
>
>
> Jordan
>
> --
> Jordan Mendelson : http://jordy.wserv.com
> Web Services, Inc. : http://www.wserv.com
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
=======================================================================
Serguei Koubouchine aka the Tamer < > The impossible we do immediately.
e-mail: ksi@gu.net SK320-RIPE < > Miracles require 24-hour notice.
=======================================================================
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/