Re: 2.1.125 Show stopper list: Draft

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@e-mind.com)
Wed, 14 Oct 1998 19:55:44 +0200 (CEST)


On Wed, 14 Oct 1998, Rik van Riel wrote:

>gotten rid of. Then I go on to hand you the fix,
>only to have my arguments completely ignored by
>you and to be continuously insulted with blatant
>statements like this.

I don' t insult _you_. I simply don' t agree with your code and I say my
reasons.

And as second I continue to think my patch doesn' t need changes because
it' s just very near to stall with kswapd running all the time and it' s
far from failing allocating memory here. If somewhere it will fail I' d
like to know.

I am ignoring your "bad 2.1.8x days" argument just because many many
things are changed from 2.1.8x and I can' t trust your "it' s the same"
beacuse it _can' t_ be the same. There are so many differences that you
can' t prove that my patch fail allocating memory because 8x was doing so.
Please don't ask me to trust such assumption (or to download 2.1.8x ;-).

>If you don't want to answer to the real questions
>that I give, then don't answer the post at all.

OK.

Andrea Arcangeli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/