>As usual, the SCHED_IDLE patch has some problems:
>- if you run more SCHED_IDLE processes, only the first
> one will get any CPU time assigned
>- it is a gross hack (well, the nice +20 part looks nice
> to me, but the other parts don't)
>- it will have continuous recalculation of all process
> priorities
>
>If there is demand for it, I'll create a scheduler
>patch that includes both my stuff, Richard's RT
>stuff and a complete SCHED_IDLE package (complete
>with the nice +20 hack ;).
I hope you noticed that the patch I sent has nothing to do with SCHED_IDLE.
Well, actually it was intended as a *replacement* of the kernel
scheduling policy SCHED_IDLE, as I had a look at it and didn't like it :(
>Rik.
>
Massimiliano Ghilardi
----------------------------------------------------------------
| I have yet to meet a person who had a bad experience of Linux. |
| Most have never had an experience. |
----------------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/