[SEMI OFFTOPIC] symbolic links

Shawn Leas (sleas@ixion.honeywell.com)
Tue, 20 Oct 1998 22:24:33 -0500 (CDT)


Does anybody here know if there is a standard that defines
what should happen when chmod'ing a symlink?

GIVEN:

$ ln -s somefile somelink

$ ls -l somefile somelink
-rw-r--r-- 1 sleas sys 0 Oct 20 22:21 somefile
lrwxr-xr-x 1 sleas sys 8 Oct 20 22:21 somelink -> somefile

If I "chmod 600 somelink", should that act upon somefile, or
should that change the perms on the symlink inode itself?

I ask because I have seen both behaviors on different systems.

While I'm at it, what does Linux do?

-Shawn
<=========== America Held Hostage ===========>
Day 2099 for the poor and the middle class.
Day 2118 for the rich and the dead.
823 days remaining in the Raw Deal.
<============================================>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/