>The thing is, that if we have a _real_ real-time process running (that
>doesn't need any more memory), then kswapd does _not_ have the right to
>take over. That in itself is proof that kswapd must never be real-time.
Agreed. I just thought about that btw.
Andrea Arcangeli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/