2.1.126 SMP scheduling

Scott McNab (jedi@tartarus.uwa.edu.au)
Tue, 27 Oct 1998 17:41:51 +0800 (WST)


Hello.

Has process scheduling been changed significantly between 2.1.125 and
2.1.126? On my dual PII-300 the responsiveness of the machine when both
processors are loaded seems considerably worse.

Under 2.1.125 I could run 2 l3enc processes simultaneously with normal
priority and it would not visibly disturb the X server for most
activities.

However, using 2.1.126 I find that as soon as I start these 2 processes
the mouse cursor under X becomes very jumpy and slow to respond making
the system unpleasant to use.

I am not sure whether it is due to a change in the scheduling algorithm
or whether there is some other problem but kswapd seems to take a lot
more CPU cycles than previously (according to top).

Has anyone else noticed similar symptoms? Please CC me in the reply as
I'm not subscribed to this list.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scott McNab Phone: +61 8 9386 0540
Software Engineer Student Support Officer
Research and Development Dept University Computing Services
Fractal Graphics University of Western Australia
http://www.fractal.csiro.au/ http://www.uwa.edu.au/
sdm@fractal.csiro.au jedi@tartarus.uwa.edu.au

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/