Re: 2.2.0 and egcs 1.1 was Re: Sorry, wrong gcc-version

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 27 Oct 1998 16:07:11 +0000 (GMT)


> BTW. Linus and Alan are utterly wrong in theyr bashing of egcs. The single
> one sufficient reason which gratifies the usage of egcs over gcc-2.7.x is:

I make a point of not bashing egcs for good reasons. The 2.0.x kernel + egcs
stuff is _not_ generally egcs problems. I'm solely interested in shipping
a highly stable 2.0.x kernel tree. The warning trap for 2.0 + egcs now
points you to Florian's page. Does Florian have fixes for all the potential
stuff in there - the clobbers, the gcc/egcs bugs, the kernel volatile marking,
and for kernel bugs where somethign happens not to get re-ordered...

I don't know.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/