Re: Linux kernel in breach of GPL ?

Darren Reed (avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au)
Wed, 4 Nov 1998 00:48:26 +1100 (EDT)

In some mail from Gregory Maxwell, sie said:
[...]
> Since there is no other expressed in this file, then it means it's under
> the same licence as the rest of the archive (as expressed in COPYING).

Hmmm, that's another nit - shouldn't COPYING be called LICENSE or there
at least be a file called LICENSE pointing to COPYING ? COPYING isn't
the most intuitive name for a file with the GPL, I'd have thought.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/