Re: Tunnel device semantics

Chip Salzenberg (chip@perlsupport.com)
Thu, 5 Nov 1998 19:06:16 -0500

According to Jan Kasprzak:
> I think the more logical approach to the problem would be
> the following:
>
> # ifconfig {tunl,gre}0 myend pointopoint otherend [ netmask 255.255.255.255 ]
> # route add -net othernet gw otherend

Yes, PLEASE. The current setup is just insane.

-- 
Chip Salzenberg        - a.k.a. -        <chip@perlsupport.com>
      "There -- we made them swerve slightly!"   //MST3K


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/