Re: MAX_DMA_ADDRESS, virt_to_bus (and 3c505.c bug)

Philip Blundell (philb@gnu.org)
Fri, 06 Nov 1998 20:45:00 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Riley Williams: "Re: [PATCH] Patch to Memory Subsystem ... (Needed?)"
Previous message: Evan Van Dyke: "acct.c failing while compiling 2.1.126"
Maybe in reply to: Jan Kasprzak: "MAX_DMA_ADDRESS, virt_to_bus (and 3c505.c bug)"

>Now I have grep'd the Linux sources for the MAX_DMA_ADDRESS.
>I have found that 3c505.c uses MAX_DMA_ADDRESS once comparing
>it with some pointer, but on the other place it compares the MAX_DMA_ADDRESS
>and virt_to_bus(the same pointer). I think 3c505.c is broken at this
>place and needs to be fixed. Am I right there?

Almost certainly. I'll take a look asap.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Riley Williams: "Re: [PATCH] Patch to Memory Subsystem ... (Needed?)"
Previous message: Evan Van Dyke: "acct.c failing while compiling 2.1.126"
Maybe in reply to: Jan Kasprzak: "MAX_DMA_ADDRESS, virt_to_bus (and 3c505.c bug)"