Re: kerneli blowfish/twofish compromised?

Chris Wedgwood (cw@ix.net.nz)
Tue, 24 Nov 1998 09:05:33 +1300

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Hans-Joachim Baader: "Re: 2.0.36 SMP time accounting"
Previous message: Robert Edmonds: "Dvorak+Magic SysRq"
Next in thread: Ion Badulescu: "Re: Possible bug in wait4(), 2.1.126-129 ?"
Reply: Ion Badulescu: "Re: Possible bug in wait4(), 2.1.126-129 ?"
Reply: Torbjorn Lindgren: "Re: Possible bug in wait4(), 2.1.126-129 ?"
Reply: Chip Salzenberg: "SIGCHLD and SIG_IGN"

On Mon, Nov 23, 1998 at 01:16:33PM +0100, Olaf Titz wrote:

> How would this work without extra storage for the IV?

The IV could be a function of the block number and some secret.

-cw

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Hans-Joachim Baader: "Re: 2.0.36 SMP time accounting"
Previous message: Robert Edmonds: "Dvorak+Magic SysRq"
Next in thread: Ion Badulescu: "Re: Possible bug in wait4(), 2.1.126-129 ?"
Reply: Ion Badulescu: "Re: Possible bug in wait4(), 2.1.126-129 ?"
Reply: Torbjorn Lindgren: "Re: Possible bug in wait4(), 2.1.126-129 ?"
Reply: Chip Salzenberg: "SIGCHLD and SIG_IGN"