Re: yesss, sound in 2.0.36

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 25 Nov 1998 16:43:59 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Benjamin Redelings I: "MM experience with 2.1.130-3: swapping versus uncaching?"
Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: MM tuning, was: Re: Linux-2.1.129.."
In reply to: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: yesss, sound in 2.0.36"

> > Use 2.0.36 , or extract the relevant bits from the 2.0.36 diff
>
> Yeah .. sorry, I didn't mean to imply that people shouldn't be using

I didnt take it that way, its just that some of the support stuff
modular sound and a few other things are now using got merged into 2.0.36
proper rather than 2.0.35 - notably support for multiple file modules
with some files exporting symbols (Rules.make)

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Benjamin Redelings I: "MM experience with 2.1.130-3: swapping versus uncaching?"
Previous message: Stephen C. Tweedie: "Re: MM tuning, was: Re: Linux-2.1.129.."
In reply to: Peter T. Breuer: "Re: yesss, sound in 2.0.36"