Re: Configure.help

Khimenko Victor (khim@sch57.msk.ru)
Sat, 28 Nov 1998 17:06:08 +0300 (MSK)


28-Nov-98 11:12 you wrote:
>>Correct would be "ls -l /lib/libc-*" and look for libc-2.1.0.so or so,
>>yes?

> Yes.

NO! After upgrade to glibc 2.1 via just `tar -x` you'll end up with TWO (or
more) files libc-* in /lib but only one will be used. `ls -l /lib/libc.so.*`
is MORE CORRECT way! See:
-- cut --
[root@localhost /root]# ls -l /lib/libc.so.*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 13 May 31 1998 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.0.7.so
[root@localhost /root]#
-- cut --
As you could see there ARE correct full name for libc and this is EXACTLY
name of used library EVEN if there are more then one libc-* file !

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/