Re: [patch] entry.S asm improvement (removed some ugly jmp)

Benoit Poulot-Cazajous (Benoit.Poulot-Cazajous@France.Sun.COM)
28 Nov 1998 19:51:22 +0100


> Is there any volunteers that could do a benchmark of 2.1.130 and 2.1.130 +
> my asm patch?

Yes. I have an old micro-benchmark (old, but extremely stable) that measures
how many times "signal();kill(myself,..)" can be run per second :

With 2.1.130 : 164564..164606 loops/s
With 2.1.130 + your patch : 164243..164329 loops/s

lat_sig (from lmbench) says :
2.1.130 2.1.130 + your patch
Signal handler installation: 1.490us 1.490 us
Signal handler overhead: 3.844us 3.854 us

So it look like micro-benchmarks agree with the simulation ;-)

-- Benoit

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/