X86 remote debug support??

Eric Van Tassell 1 (evt@texelsoft.com)
Sat, 5 Dec 1998 21:44:25 -0500


Has anybody done this? Is anybody working on it? Would anybody whose been
involved doing it for other architectures care to comment on the scope of
the job?

-evt

Eric van Tassell
Texel Software, Inc. - System Software Engineering for Windows/NT
277 Cochran Hill Rd. Voice : 603-487-5006
New Boston, NH 03070 USA Fax : 603-487-5166
email : evt@texelsoft.com
http://www.texelsoft.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
> [mailto:owner-linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu]On Behalf Of MOLNAR Ingo
> Sent: Saturday, December 05, 1998 8:01 AM
> To: Chris Evans
> Cc: Kurt Garloff; Linux kernel list; Linus Torvalds; Alan Cox
> Subject: Re: 960MB limitation for 2.2 ?
>
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Dec 1998, Chris Evans wrote:
>
> > Removing it seems silly. If users can't be trusted to get it right then
> > don't expose the settable option through the "make config" "make
> > menuconfig" etc. interfaces. But by all means leave the #define (heavily
> > commented of course) in a Makefile or include somewhere.
>
> actually, there was one more ugliness too: i was unable to pass parameters
> to the ld script properly, so ended up passing it via a temporary
> file ...
> (the 2.0 patch doesnt have this problem since we do not use lds scripts
> there.)
>
> -- mingo
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/