Re: 2.1.131 isn't quite it for me

Nicolai Langfeldt (
Mon, 07 Dec 1998 14:28:02 +0100 (Alan Cox) tastet:
> > - NFS write performance it _horrid_. 50-100% worse than under
> > 2.0.36. The server is Dec-Unix 4.0D. The machines are connected
> > by 100Mbit switched ethernet. Using
> It will be for servers with 8K page size (ie DEC Unix, Solaris Sparc)

Ok. Is this a matter of design problem or closer to 'just a matter
of programming'? If NFS is going to be that slow I'll either have
to undertake to fix it or switch to a BSD :-I

The mounted rsize/wsize was 8k as under 2.0, that might not be optimal


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
Please read the FAQ at