Re: [2.1.131-ac5] MM Experience with X in 6,8 Megs RAM (page cache too large ?)

Stephen C. Tweedie (sct@redhat.com)
Fri, 11 Dec 1998 14:37:19 GMT


Hi,

On Wed, 9 Dec 1998 20:13:19 +0100 (CET), Rik van Riel
<H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> said:

> Data that is swap-cached is also (erroneously?) reported as
> page cache. I think we should either change the code or the
> documentation... Opinions?

We have a "unified VM". The VM is unified with the data cache.
That's what the page cache _is_. Document it, sure; add an extra line
in the "free" output showing (cache-shared) to make this explicit,
fine; but I don't think we need to change the accounting.

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/