languages

Rick Hohensee (humbubba@raptor.cqi.com)
Mon, 14 Dec 1998 11:39:50 -0500 (EST)


Similarities between control languages for automata and for
human use have only the merest superficial similarities.
A semantic quantum, a word, to an automaton has an unambiguous
resulting action. A collection of these actions can describe
the machine, and run it.

Human words are organic. They have lengthy histories, which
are thier meaning. A dictionary is cyclicly self-referential,
because the roots of a human languange are the roots of the
humans using the language. There are a number of words that are
strongly believed to be the same in e.g. English as they were
in Indo-European, 6000 years ago. "ail" , "whore" and similar.
( neat stuff on that in the back of the American Heritage
Dictionary, IIRC )
The meaning of a human word is the overlap of the histories
of the users' histories vis-a-vis that word.

Thus it would take some unimaginable computing power to
model the actual interactions caused by an occurence of a word
like "our" between two humans.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/