Re: mmap() is slower than read() on SCSI/IDE on 2.0 and 2.1

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Philippe MOULARD: "Re: mmap() is slower than read() on SCSI/IDE on 2.0 and 2.1"
• Previous message: John P . Looney: "Re: Is it legal for me to do that?"

On Thu, 17 Dec 1998 01:27:05 +0100 (CET), Rik van Riel
<H.H.vanRiel@phys.uu.nl> said:

> Once again, you seem to be forgetting about read-behind.

No, I'm ignoring read-behind. If people access data backwards then
tough. Real disks don't work that way.

--Stephen

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Philippe MOULARD: "Re: mmap() is slower than read() on SCSI/IDE on 2.0 and 2.1"
• Previous message: John P . Looney: "Re: Is it legal for me to do that?"