Nobody is "getting mad". RMS has an opinion ; albeit a pretty damn
strong opinion (and he is in a position where his opinions get a lot of
attention and discussion). However, I doubt that he'd strike back at the
community at large solely because they don't _all_ agree with him.
> (and e.g. allows proprietary forking etc), thus affecting
> all programs currently licenced under the GPL, what could anyone do about
> that? And please don't say, "oh, he would *never* do something like that."
>
Why don't you read, and then reread the exact clause that you so kindly
attached in this ridiculous scenario. A new "nightmare" GPL version
would not affect any programs currently licensed under the GPL.
> Shake in your boots.
>
Shiver in your ignorance.
> This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> (at your option) any later version.
>
Best Regards,
Raj
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/