Re: 2.2.0-pre1-ac4: unresolved symbol unix98_max_ptys
H. Peter Anvin (hpa@transmeta.com)
Tue, 5 Jan 1999 16:34:31 -0800 (PST)
> On 4 Jan 1999, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > Followup to: <368F7DCC.697F5344@student.anu.edu.au>
> > By author: Martijn van Oosterhout <v3100411@student.anu.edu.au>
> > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> [snip]
>
> > 1. Don't compile Unix98 as a module (although it should work, it is a
> > highly discouraged configuration -- the modular option is mainly for
> > testing, as the modularity overhead is significant.)
>
> Then, would it be possible to mark only the modular code [experimental]
> with some kind of configure/menuconfig/xconfig hack?! That is, if you
> enable [experimental], it'd show < >, else [ ]....
>
> /David Weinehall
I don't know if the systems would do the right thing if there was an
if statement saying either tristate or bool; perhaps worth a shot...
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/