Re: Working towards 2.2.0: Cosmetics..

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Thu, 7 Jan 1999 23:01:42 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [patch] new-vm improvement [Re: 2.2.0 Bug summary]"
Previous message: Kenneth Albanowski: "Re: Porting vfork()"
In reply to: Benjamin Scherrey: "Re: C++ in kernel (was Re: exception in a device driver)"

> int e8390_base = dev->base_addr;
> - struct ei_device *ei_local = (struct ei_device *) dev->priv;
> +#ifdef EI_LOCAL_NEEDED_FOR_EI_SHIFT
> + struct ei_device *ei_local = (struct ei_device *) dev->priv;
> +#endif
>
> outb_p(E8390_NODMA+E8390_PAGE0, e8390_base+E8390_CMD);

Linus has an opinion about such ifdefs. All those you submit to him vanish
mysteriously.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: [patch] new-vm improvement [Re: 2.2.0 Bug summary]"
Previous message: Kenneth Albanowski: "Re: Porting vfork()"
In reply to: Benjamin Scherrey: "Re: C++ in kernel (was Re: exception in a device driver)"