Re: Cheap network for two hosts ?

Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH (allbery@kf8nh.apk.net)
Sun, 10 Jan 1999 16:41:06 -0500


In message <Pine.LNX.3.96.990110032934.23377E-100000@red.prv>, "Mike A.
Harris"
writes:
+-----
| On Mon, 28 Dec 1998, Horst von Brand wrote:
| > You have to be very careful with conectors, terminators,
|
| But you can be careless with UTP connectors and hubs?
+--->8

More careless --- UTP is more forgiving than 10Base2; if you leave a cable
dangling unconnected (or accidentally snap the cable) a UTP LAN will still
work aside from the machine(s) disconnected by the cable break, whereas
10Base2 will probably give you many errors and kill throughput on the entire
LAN.

It's considered bad form for a cable break on one side of the building to
screw up a file transfer between two machines next to each other on the
other side of the building... bot with 10Base2 this can happen.

And Cat.5 is more flexible; I can run a cable under the floor a lot more
easily and with less risk of damaging the cable (see previous paragraph).
Putting a kink in coax can put a pretty serious kink in your network even if
the cable isn't broken!

-- 
brandon s. allbery	[os/2][linux][solaris][japh]	 allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator	     [WAY too many hats]	   allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering			 KF8NH
     We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/