Should we have MAXSYMLINKS?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Jaeson Engle: "Re: compression modules"
• Previous message: Nathan Myers: "FUD aside, one C++ question remains"
• Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: Should we have MAXSYMLINKS?"
• Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: Should we have MAXSYMLINKS?"
• Maybe reply: Tom Eastep: "Re: Should we have MAXSYMLINKS?"
• Maybe reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Should we have MAXSYMLINKS?"

I got this. Should glibc/linux have MAXSYMLINKS?

-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@gnu.org)

---
If you have not already done so, please add a definition for the constant
MAXSYMLINKS to the <sys/param.h> file, define it to some appropriate value
(FreeBSD uses 32), and then please try to get the kernel developers to use
it in all places where they are trying to decide when to stop chasing down
a chain of symlinks.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/






 Next message: Jaeson Engle: "Re: compression modules"
 Previous message: Nathan Myers: "FUD aside, one C++ question remains"

 Next in thread: Alexander Viro: "Re: Should we have MAXSYMLINKS?"
 Reply: Alexander Viro: "Re: Should we have MAXSYMLINKS?"
 Maybe reply: Tom Eastep: "Re: Should we have MAXSYMLINKS?"
 Maybe reply: Alan Cox: "Re: Should we have MAXSYMLINKS?"