Re: pre9/final-Bug, introduced in pre8

Kurt Huwig (kurt@huwig.de)
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 00:20:36 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Tim Waugh: "Re: down_interruptible and timers"
Previous message: Dan Glover: "ESS688: no go in pre[89]"
Maybe in reply to: Kurt Huwig: "pre9/final-Bug, introduced in pre8"

Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 1999, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I haven't actually tested this, but it looks really obvious, so does this
> > patch fix it for you? (This should also fix a potential performance
> > bogosity - there's absolutely no reason why we should get the directory
> > lock when we don't need to for a normal open of an existing file).
> It fixes the problem here.

Smooth like a baby

Kurt
----------------------------------------------------------------
Let me make myself perfectly clear: Step 1: Find plan!
Step 2: Save
world!
Let's get crackin'... Step 3: Get outta my house!

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Tim Waugh: "Re: down_interruptible and timers"
Previous message: Dan Glover: "ESS688: no go in pre[89]"
Maybe in reply to: Kurt Huwig: "pre9/final-Bug, introduced in pre8"