Re: 2.2.0 patch (where) ?

Matti Aarnio (matti.aarnio@sonera.fi)
Tue, 26 Jan 1999 16:03:24 +0200 (EET)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Linyux 2.2.0ac1"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Why is "GenuineIntel" the default vendor_id?"
In reply to: Neil Conway: "Re: 2.2.0 patch (where) ?"

Neil Conway <nconway.list@UKAEA.ORG.UK> worries:
> MOLNAR Ingo wrote:
> > it's patch-2.2.0-final in the v2.1 directory.
>
> Oh dear. Maybe Linus was feeling masochistic this morning, cos we now
> have TWO 2.2.0-final kernels to deal with. I thought everyone was going
> nuts until I looked, and since 1am today (Tuesday) 2.2.0-final has
> existed, and is even (woohoo) in the v2.2 directory ;-)

But with the new one the 'uname -a' will tell '2.2.0', NOT
'2.2.0-final'. Speak about 'THE 2.2.0'

...
> Neil

/Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@sonera.fi>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alan Cox: "Linyux 2.2.0ac1"
Previous message: Rik van Riel: "Re: Why is "GenuineIntel" the default vendor_id?"
In reply to: Neil Conway: "Re: 2.2.0 patch (where) ?"