> Woops I did a little mistake in it. Excuse me. When we do remove_bh() we
Well, if you ask me, you should also treat bh_mask atomically (using
set_bit() & co). Otherwise it can get corrupted, as in your patch some
accesses to it are not protected by the spinlock.
I know that many people out there consider these problems too subtle,
but I can't help myself - I just tend to nail down every bug I spot
(err, I mean, the software ones :)
Patrik
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/