Re: split-includes?

Brian Gerst (bgerst@quark.vpplus.com)
Sat, 30 Jan 1999 11:58:20 -0500

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael Loftis: "Bloat thread..."
Previous message: robbie@scot-mur.demon.co.uk: "Re: proper place to discuss kernel 'bloatedness'?"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Butler: "split-includes?"

Chris Butler wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Are the files created by the split-includes script actually used yet?
>
> >From what I understand, the idea is to reduce the dependencies on
> include/linux/config.h, but it would seem that most files still
> include this instead of files from include/config/...

Each Makefile includes the .depend file in that directory which is
created from make depend. The .depend files never point to config.h
directly, but to include/config/*.

Brian Gerst

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Michael Loftis: "Bloat thread..."
Previous message: robbie@scot-mur.demon.co.uk: "Re: proper place to discuss kernel 'bloatedness'?"
Maybe in reply to: Chris Butler: "split-includes?"