Re: Proxyarp is not working with kernel 2.2.0

Andi Kleen (ak@muc.de)
03 Feb 1999 16:23:28 +0100


In article <199902021849.VAA23780@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru writes:
> Hello!
>> In article <m107gGP-0007U1C@the-village.bc.nu>,
>>
>> The problem is that noone stood up to write a proxy arp daemon yet.

> I promised and promise again, if someone will explain why
> he needs subnet proxy arp, it will be ready the next evening.

I don't know why, I have never seen a use for it that couldn't be solved
with routing table changes @)

> What's about different outputs of "arp -a":
> ceratinly, it is deal of taste, but to my not-very-well breed taste,
> 2.1 gives much nicer and intelligible output. 8)8)

What do you mean?

> PS Hurra! I understood why I send empty messages sometimes!
> I hope, previous one is the last one.

Cool.

-Andi

P.S.: I hope your don't limit ICMPs to localhost patch makes it in soon -
the problem bite me just recently.

-- 
This is like TV. I don't like TV.

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/