Re: Makefile targets again :-) (Was Re: compile)

Michael Elizabeth Chastain (mec@shout.net)
Wed, 3 Feb 1999 10:20:29 -0600


Hi Neil,

Neil> Well I would, but I'm not confident if all the options (a) still work
Neil> and (b) are "safe/supported". The only people who can answer those
Neil> questions are the likes of Linus and/or the authors of the targets,
Neil> unless they are prepared to wade through all the code with a microscope
Neil> looking for potential problems. I like to use my time efficiently if
Neil> possible and that's not the kind of thing I can do efficiently.

Hey, just write the docs and post them to the linux-kbuild list. I'll
take care of validating them against the actual kernel behaviour.

Neil> For example, do you think an ordinary mortal can just inspect the code
Neil> and figure out when he does and doesn't need to do "make mrproper"?

No, I don't, but I'm working on that. Download the Dancing Makefiles and
play with them.

Neil> (AFAICS, patching a makefile isn't caught by the dependencies, which
Neil> seems odd.)

Patching a Makefile doesn't need to be caught.

The obvious next question is "what happens if I change the compilation
flags for foo.c", and the answer is "that does need to be caught, *is*
caught, do an "ls -a" sometime and read Documentation/smart-config.txt".

Dude, let's take this discussion over to linux-kbuild, that's what it's
for.

Michael

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/