Re: 2.2.1 lockup (SCSI related)

Guest section DW (dwguest@win.tue.nl)
Fri, 5 Feb 1999 15:30:44 +0100 (MET)


From: smurf@noris.de (Matthias Urlichs)

dwguest@win.tue.nl (Guest section DW) writes:
> [ semaphores made recursive ]
> It's even more absurd that such a fundamental change in the semantics
> of a core kernel primitive was made during the deep code freeze.

No, I didnt write that.
Please check your attributions.

What's the problem with allowing recursive semaphores? It doesn't break
anything which wasn't broken before. The only difference is that now your
code can continue while before it would deadlock.

I have no opinion yet about these recursive semaphores.
But from the reports it seems that scsi_error was broken by the change.

Andries

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/