Re: 2.2.1 scheduler behavior

Claude Gamache (cgamache@cae.ca)
19 Feb 1999 18:13:52 -0500


Rik van Riel <riel@nl.linux.org> writes:

> >
> > In the scheduler, is the PROC_CHANGE_PENALTY is large enough, is it
> > something else ?
>
> It could have something to do with that. Once 2.2.2 comes
> out (solving my reboot problems) I'll be working on a new
> (or adapted) Linux scheduler that should solve all these
> problems and possibly have less overhead than the current
> one.
>
> > Is there something to do to adress this ?
>
> Not yet, you'll have to wait for the patch...
> cheers,
>
> Rik -- If a Microsoft product fails, who do you sue?

I am greatly interested, if I can help you in any way, please let me
know.

Claude

-- 
  Claude Gamache, CAE Electronique Ltee, 8585 Cote-de-Liesse  
  Saint-Laurent,  Quebec, Canada H4T 1G6                        
  Email: cgamache@cae.ca  Tel.: (514) 341-2000 x3194, Fax: (514) 734-5612

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/