Re: APM & Linux 2.2.1

Marc Lehmann (pcg@goof.com)
Sun, 21 Feb 1999 23:37:19 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alex Buell: "Linking a module driver via mount through the VFS layer"
Previous message: Larry Ayers: "Mounting BFS partition oddness"
In reply to: david parsons: "Whoops. Don't try to submit kernel patches when you've got the flu (Re: New new enhanced memory det"

On Sun, Feb 21, 1999 at 10:52:38PM +1100, Stephen.Rothwell@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> + if (smp_num_cpus > 1) {
> + printk(KERN_NOTICE "apm: disabled - APM is not SMP safe.\n");
> + if (smp_hack)
> + smp_hack = 2;
> + return;
> + }
> +#endif
> #ifdef CONFIG_APM_DO_ENABLE

If that doesn't work you might want to move that code-fragment even
further down, just before the init_time. (But it currently works as shown
on my machine)

> Marc also said he added "apm_enabled = 1" just before returning in the
> CONFIG_SMP check above, but I do not see how that could have affected
> anything.

It doesn't, I have removed it.

--
-----==- |
----==-- _ |
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / pcg@goof.com |e|
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
The choice of a GNU generation |
|

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Alex Buell: "Linking a module driver via mount through the VFS layer"
Previous message: Larry Ayers: "Mounting BFS partition oddness"
In reply to: david parsons: "Whoops. Don't try to submit kernel patches when you've got the flu (Re: New new enhanced memory det"