Re: Kernel 2.2.1 and sysvinit 2.76 possible bug

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Thu, 25 Feb 1999 21:29:17 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Spud: "[OFFTOPIC] Re: 2.2.2: 2 thumbs up from lm"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.2.2 TCP delays every 41st small packet by 10-20 ms"

> with the kernel. This could be generalised to a queue of standby
> init processes, if desired. When init fails, the kernel would make
> the (first) standby init process the new init process and notify it of

You can do everything you described that I can imagine by catching the
signals in the init and exec()'ing a new one.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Spud: "[OFFTOPIC] Re: 2.2.2: 2 thumbs up from lm"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Linux 2.2.2 TCP delays every 41st small packet by 10-20 ms"