>> 0.* tso
>> 1.0.* drew
>> 1.1.* hawes
>> 1.2.* sct
>> 1.3.* ingo
>> 2.0.* alan
>> 2.1.* linus
>> 2.2.* davem
> Wouldn't it make more sense to use a logical naming scheme
> (boring yes)
> stable-1996
> unstable-1996
> etc by year of x.y.0
Why bother with years - use something easily predictable, such as...
0.* lx-0
1.0.* lx-1-0
1.1.* lx-1-1
1.2.* lx-1-2
1.3.* lx-1-3
2.0.* lx-2-0
2.1.* lx-2-1
2.2.* lx-2-2
2.3.* lx-2-3
Best wishes from Riley.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* ftp://ftp.MemAlpha.cx/pub/rhw/Linux
* http://www.MemAlpha.cx/kernel.versions.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/