> > 0.* tso
> > 1.0.* drew
> > 1.1.* hawes
> > 1.2.* sct
> > 1.3.* ingo
> > 2.0.* alan
> > 2.1.* linus
> > 2.2.* davem
>
> Wouldn't it make more sense to use a logical naming scheme (boring yes)
>
> stable-1996
> unstable-1996
>
> etc by year of x.y.0
Or, if we decide for non-logical, how about naming them by the funniest /
silliest pet name (kinda like O'Reilly and the Camel and Bat books) that
Linus used in that cycle. For example, the 2.1.* could be the "basted
turkey" release, or whatever Linus called the one (2.1.130 or so) that came
out around Thanksgiving....
later,
chris
--
Chris Ricker kaboom@gatech.edu
chris.ricker@m.cc.utah.edu
Nobody tells me what to think,
except Mrs. Pauling.
-- Linus Pauling
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/