Re: performance & you-know-who

Michael H. Warfield (mhw@wittsend.com)
Sat, 8 May 1999 21:38:08 -0400 (EDT)


Albert D. Cahalan enscribed thusly:

> There is a _new_ "Open Benchmark Invitation" on Mindcraft's site.
> http://www.mindcraft.com/openbenchmark.html

> This one is hard to refuse. PC Week has offered to supply the lab
> and settle disputes over the rules. We got NT clients added, along
> with an unlimited-patch test run and some random minor junk.

> (we can kill atime, mke2fs with fancy options or use reiserfs, add the
> Beowulf hack for multiple Ethernet cards, hack the scheduler, etc.)

> Linux might really lose. This is like benchmarking knfsd against the
> user-space NFS, with NT getting the kernel-mode advantage. Ouch.
> NT will be keeping all files open during the entire http test,
> binding processes and cards to processors, etc.

> At least we get to spend a day tuning, so somebody will get a chance
> to profile the kernel on very expensive hardware. If Linux does lose,
> somebody might even get bothered enough to write ksmbd and khttpd.

I want Tridge (Andrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org>) or Jeremey
(Jeremy Allison <jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>) of the Samba team in
the loop on this. Jeremey, in particular, has been involved in benchmarks
that have wiped the floor with NT.

> To refuse is to admit failure, not even giving Linux a chance.

Mike

-- 
 Michael H. Warfield    |  (770) 985-6132   |  mhw@WittsEnd.com
  (The Mad Wizard)      |  (770) 925-8248   |  http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/
  NIC whois:  MHW9      |  An optimist believes we live in the best of all
 PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471    |  possible worlds.  A pessimist is sure of it!

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/