I have no opinion as to which debugger to merge in with IKD. I do agree
with
Tigran that my kernel gdb patch is appropriate for inclusion with the
kernel
source. It appears that the kernel developers for the other
architectures
took an earlier version of this patch and then integrated it into the
kernel
source for their architectures. Thus, the i386 architecture was the
only one
not to have this patch incorporated into the kernel source.
I have had no response from Linus thus far on my request.
-- Dave
Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I released a new 2.2.8_ikd1. As usual it has the kernel tracer, print-eip,
> memleak detector, stack overflow meter/detector, semaphore deadlock
> oopser, NMI deadlock oopser, kernel debugger etc....
>
> About the debugger, now there should be an updated kernel debugger by
> David Grothe <dave@gcom.com> somewhere, and I seen also a debugger from
> SGI. Which is the better one to merge in the ikd tree?
>
> Andrea Arcangeli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/