An excellent point. Perhaps a config option?
> What is needed is better userland configuration tools, not a
> modified kernel build system that mucks with userland config
> files. Try using linuxconf, etc... If your module options are
> set in conf.modules, and you recompile a kernel, even of a newer
> version, rarely if ever do the module parameters change.
Perhaps a new module for linuxconf. A user might be able to use said new
module in the place of the make menuconfig ( or xconfig, etc ). Also - the
possibility to do remote recompiles would then exist ( via linuxconf's remote
usages.)
Now that might or might not be a good thing :)
( I'll cross post to linuxconf list to get that rolling )
-- ---------------------+--------------------------------------- James Michael Keller | jmkeller@radix.net "Tech" | http://www.radix.net/~jmkeller ---------------------+--------------------------------------- Contents (c)1999 James Michael Keller -------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/