Re: [OT**n] RE: Linux name in BAD taste
david parsons (o.r.c@p.e.l.l.p.o.r.t.l.a.n.d.o.r.u.s)
21 May 1999 14:28:22 -0700
In article <linux.kernel.435C366F075ED211B12200204840172D703F8A@petitsuix>,
BROWN Nick <Nick.BROWN@coe.int> wrote:
>
> >The site www.linuxhq.org has a home page
> >with extremely vulgar language. This is definatly
> >not the image that should be associated with linux.
>
>Hmmm. I just connected to that site and:
>
>1) No vulgar language I could see - a bit of dubious grammar, perhaps.
>Looks like the site was made "the right way" (with vi).
It's Frame City; definitly not the right way.
____
david parsons \bi/ One would think that a Linux site would have the
\/ common decency to build a lynx-compatable web page.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/