Re: [OT] Re: Linux name in BAD taste

James Michael Keller (jmkeller@radix.net)
Mon, 24 May 1999 10:52:19 -0400

Matthew Vanecek wrote:
>
> alex.buell@tahallah.demon.co.uk wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 19 May 1999, Thomas E. Dodd /CSDC wrote:
> >
> > > The site www.linuxhq.org has a home page with extremely vulgar
> > > language. This is definatly not the image that should be associated
> > > with linux.
> >
> > I just looked. WHAT *vulgar* langauge?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Alex.
> >
>
> That's what I was wondering. All I saw was regret that linuxhq.com had
> disappeared, and an inquiry about the location of the pages' sources
> that were there. I sent him a pointer to kernelnotes.org, which seems
> to be linuxhq.com's replacement.
>

Speaking of that - what the heck happend with that? How did it get yanked
after two years? Everything I've heard has been very vuage at best.

-- 
---------------------+---------------------------------------
James Michael Keller | 	jmkeller@radix.net
      "Tech"         |  http://www.radix.net/~jmkeller
---------------------+---------------------------------------
"Linux is not a destination, 
		       it is simply an open road to tomorrow"
-------------------------------------------------------------			
	     Contents (c)1999 James Michael Keller
-------------------------------------------------------------


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/