Re: Where's the patch to 2.2.0?

Riley Williams (rhw@MemAlpha.CX)
Mon, 24 May 1999 17:07:40 +0100 (GMT)


Hi there.

>>> this might be discusse already, but why is there no
>>> patch-2.2.0-pre9-to-2.2.0 (or something like that)??
>>> My guess that '2.2.0-final' is '2.2.0' was obviously wrong.

>> Why is it 'obviously wrong' then?

>> Q> 23248 Tue Jan 26 01:41:00 1999 patch-2.2.0-final.bz2
>> Q> 10592549 Tue Jan 26 01:41:00 1999 linux-2.2.0.tar.bz2

>> Curious that the patch you declare to be wrong and the 2.2.0
>> kernel tarball have identical timestamps if they're for different
>> kernels...

> So, have you tried to apply the 'patch-2.2.1' to a
> 'patch-2.2.0-pre9'-patched kernel tree (The Makefile says
> '-final')? It produces lots of rejects.

It will, since that's the wrong version to patch from. Based on the
tarball and patch files on the SunSITE uk mirror at...

ftp://SunSITE.Org.UK/Mirrors/ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/

...I would assume the following to be the correct sequence:

Q> 10534303 Jan 13 22:05 v2.1/linux-2.2.0-pre7.tar.bz2
Q> 199328 Jan 19 01:52 v2.1/patch-2.2.0-pre8.bz2
Q> 10538971 Jan 19 01:52 v2.1/linux-2.2.0-pre8.tar.bz2
Q> 173903 Jan 21 06:42 v2.1/patch-2.2.0-pre9.bz2
Q> 10588011 Jan 21 06:42 v2.1/linux-2.2.0-pre9.tar.bz2
Q> 23248 Jan 26 01:41 v2.1/patch-2.2.0-final.bz2
Q> 10592549 Jan 26 01:41 v2.2/linux-2.2.0.tar.bz2
Q> 22778 Jan 28 20:56 v2.2/patch-2.2.1.bz2
Q> 10610697 Jan 28 20:56 v2.2/linux-2.2.1.tar.bz2
Q> 86608 Feb 23 02:58 v2.2/patch-2.2.2.bz2
Q> 10625888 Feb 23 02:58 v2.2/linux-2.2.2.tar.bz2

> And the diff -urN between
> 'linux-2.2.0-pre9' and 'linux-2.2.0' I had to produce by myself
> (which I expected to find as 'patch-2.2.0-pre9-to-2.2.0')
> is not small, 23315 bytes in it's .bz2 version.

It should be 23248 bytes, as per the listing above...

> And I have never seen a 'patch-2.2.0-final.bz2' !
> ^^^^^

{Shrug} Try the URL set given above, it's definately there...

Best wishes from Riley.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| There is something frustrating about the quality and speed of Linux |
| development, ie., the quality is too high and the speed is too high, |
| in other words, I can implement this XXXX feature, but I bet someone |
| else has already done so and is just about to release their patch. |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
* ftp://ftp.MemAlpha.cx/pub/rhw/Linux
* http://www.MemAlpha.cx/kernel.versions.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/