> > "uninteresting" in the standard kernel. And I think such a small group
> > of users can live with special local TCP/networking changes in a
> > "beowulf" type package, in fact they already do.
>
> Does that mean that there's no chance of seeing the Beowulf channel
> bonding (or Cisco's similar thing) in 2.3, then?
>
> Matthew.
Channel bonding (or Trunking or EtherChannel) support is something I would
like to see too. At least the addition of the IFF_RUNNING stuff that was
talked about before so it will fail over peroperly.
George Bonser
Welcome to Wit's End
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/