> On Sun, Jun 06, 1999 at 08:37:03AM -0500, Nate Riffe wrote:
> ....
> > filled to capacity and stays there until the transfer is complete. I
> > think this is a network stack problem and not a hardware problem because
> > ping -f gets 0% packet loss (one run lost 10 packets out of 60,000). This
> > only happens with bulk transfer, interactive sessions are perfectly fine.
>
> "ping -f" uses small frames, try using LARGE frames like
> bulk TCP datastream does.
>
> ping -f -s 1480 dest.host
>
> what happens ?
>
> Very likely you have hardware problems at the cabeling,
> or at the network switch.
No, I tried that two. The packet loss is still 0%.
>
> > -Nate
> > Nate Riffe Duct tape by any other name is just as
> > inkblot@geocities.com sticky.
>
> /Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@sonera.fi>
>
------------------------------------------------((\))<----------------------
Nate Riffe Duct tape by any other name is just as
inkblot@geocities.com sticky.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT/M/S/O d-@ s-:- a--->- C++ UL++++BS++>$ P+>+++ L+++>+++++$ W+ N !o
K- w(---)$>-- M-(--) V(--) PS+ PE Y+ PGP>++ t(+)@ 5 X@ R tv>! b+>+++ DI++
D e>++(+++) h r++ y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/