Re: New schedule() and semaphore implementation ...

Andrea Arcangeli (andrea@suse.de)
Fri, 11 Jun 1999 19:02:13 +0200 (CEST)


On Fri, 11 Jun 1999, Davide Libenzi wrote:

>I don't know if this is correct because of the new version of "up".

You _can't_ use it with your wake_up_sem(). I just thought about that. But
I think it would be better to do a real FIFO instead of your goodness
approch. We should have a way to choose which kind of wakeup to do on
waitqueues. And now that waitqueues are double linked list choosing
between FIFO and LIFO should be trivial.

Andrea Arcangeli

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/